图书与情报. 2007, 27(06): 121.
Abstract (
)
Download PDF (
)
Knowledge map
Save
The textual research on the authenticity of Han Feizi’s content titles has always been a difficult point in the researchfields. Contrasting in the way of the former scholar’s research from the perspective of methodology, there are some principles thatshould been pay a close attention and abide by. Firstly, Ben zhuan about the recording of Han Feizi’s works is basically true. Sec-ondly, the content titles of Han Feizi should not been easily denied if couldn’t offer a direct testimony. Thirdly, concerning with thefalse works which have been confirmed, we should not repudiate the former conclusion rashly if we can’t offer ample evidences. Fi-nally, we should synthesize the materials of many aspects, and avoid to present our arguments depend on a single testimony.