为解决缺乏代表性国家与地区算法伦理治理比较的问题，文章基于共生理论构建算法伦理治理共生系统模型，对美国、欧盟、中国的治理政策差异进行系统比较。研究发现，欧盟的治理政策强调多主体协同，美国的治理政策偏向市场自律，中国的治理政策则呈现出政府主导监管的治理特点，并且各国治理实践尚未实现一体化共生治理模式。基于比较结果，研究进一步归纳了信息资源管理学科在算法伦理治理中的三类角色及职责，为未来治理体系设计与学科参与提供政策依据。

To make an international policies comparison of algorithmic ethical governance among representative regions, this paper constructs a symbiotic system model of algorithmic ethical governance, systematically comparing the differences in governance policies of the United States, the European Union, and China. The findings reveal that the EU emphasizes multi-stakeholder collaborative governance, the U.S. favors market-oriented self-regulation, while China adopts a government-led regulatory governance. Moreover, none of the three has yet achieved an integrated symbiotic governance model. Based on the comparative results, the study further identifies three key roles and responsibilities of the information resources management discipline in algorithmic ethical governance, providing a policy foundation for future governance design and academic engagement.