图书馆与图书馆事业

公共文化服务数智化转型:逻辑意涵、风险类型与治理路径*

展开
  • (1.兰州大学管理学院   兰州   730000)
何志强,男,兰州大学管理学院博士研究生;李少惠,女,兰州大学管理学院教授,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2025-10-14

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-30

基金资助

*本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“数智时代社会力量助推乡村秩序重构的文化调适机制研究”(项目编号:25CSH115)与天津社会科学院重点项目“数字政府建设的空间演化、治理效应与机制解析”(项目编号:25YZD-12)研究成果之一。

Digital Transformation of Public Cultural Services: Logical Implications, Risk Identification, and Governance Pathways

Expand

Received date: 2025-10-14

  Online published: 2025-12-30

摘要

公共文化服务治理数智化转型是时代应有之义,是利用数智技术实现公共文化服务高质量发展的必由之路。文章基于公共文化服务治理数智化的“价值-空间-技术”三维度,构建了公共文化服务治理数智化转型逻辑意涵、风险类型识别与治理路径分析框架;厘清公共文化服务治理数智化转型,蕴含从供需分离到价值共创的价值逻辑、强化数据空间正义与城乡空间统筹的空间逻辑以及从电子化到数智化的技术逻辑三层意涵;识别新时期公共文化服务治理数智化转型存在的风险,主要凸显为伦理失范与算法偏见的价值风险、区域空间裂隙和数据空间失序的空间风险、工具支配的技术异化与系统安全挑战的技术风险三重类型。为提升公共文化服务治理数智化治理效能,应注重以数据伦理重塑与算法纠偏来治理价值风险、以区域空间正义强化与可信数据空间建设来治理空间风险、以数智技术异化调适与系统韧性强化来治理技术风险,进而促进公共文化服务治理数智化高质量发展。

本文引用格式

何志强 李少惠 . 公共文化服务数智化转型:逻辑意涵、风险类型与治理路径*[J]. 图书与情报, 2025 , 45(06) : 79 -90 . DOI: 10.11968/tsyqb.1003-6938.2025073

Abstract

The digital-intelligent transformation of public cultural service governance is an imperative of our times and the essential path to achieving high-quality development in public cultural services through digital and intelligent technologies. Based on the "value-space-technology" triad of the digital-intelligent transformation of public cultural service governance, this paper constructs an analytical framework for its logical implications, risk type identification, and governance pathways. It clarifies that this transformation encompasses three-tiered logics: a value logic shifting from supply-demand separation to co-creation of value; a spatial logic reinforcing data spatial justice and integrated urban-rural spatial planning; and a technological logic advancing from digitization to digital-intelligence. It further identifies the risks existing in the digital-intelligent transformation of public cultural service governance in the new era, mainly manifesting as three types of risks: value risks such as ethical misconduct and algorithmic bias; spatial risks including regional spatial fractures and disorder in data space; and technological risks encompassing tool-driven alienation and system security challenges. To enhance the effectiveness of digital-intelligent governance in public cultural services, efforts should focus on: addressing value risks through data ethics reshaping and algorithmic bias correction; addressing spatial risks by strengthening regional spatial justice and building trustworthy data spaces; addressing technological risks via adaptation of digital-intelligent technology alienation and reinforcement of system resilience. These measures will promote the high-quality development of the digital-intelligent governance of public cultural services.
文章导航

/