开放科学环境下，学术期刊的TOP 因子能否作为评价期刊的补充指标需要提供一定的理论依据。文章采用描述性统计方法和相关性分析方法，对开放科学中心接受评估的1797本期刊的TOP因子的均值与分布情况，以及与这些期刊的影响因子和被引频次相关性情况进行统计分析。结果发现绝大多数期刊只实施了单一的 1 级TOP 标准，期刊影响因子和总被引频次均与TOP 因子总分及TOP因子的数据引用、材料透明度、分析代码透明度和设计分析报告指南等维度呈显著的正相关关系。所以TOP因子可以成为评价期刊的一个补充指标。各学科期刊的开放科学进程不一，国内的科技期刊也应参照TOP因子中的各维度来设置开放科学的要求。

Under the open science environment, whether the TOP factor of academic journals can be used as a supplementary index to evaluate journals needs to provide a certain theoretical basis. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were used to analyze the means and distribution of TOP factors of 1797 journals evaluated by Open Science Center, as well as the correlation with impact factors and citations of these journals. The vast majority of journals only implemented a single level 1 TOP standard, and the journal’s impact factor and the total citations were significantly positively correlated with the total score of TOP factor. In each dimension of the TOP factor, the impact factor and total citations of all journals are significantly positively correlated with data citations, material transparency, analysis code transparency and design analysis report guidelines. TOP factor can be a supplementary index to evaluate journals. The open science process of journals varies in different disciplines. Chinese journals should also refer to the dimensions of TOP factor to set up the requirements of open science.