图书馆与图书馆事业

国际数字素养与技能框架的内容分析

展开
  • 1.武汉大学信息管理学院   湖北武汉   430072
    2.武汉大学图书馆   湖北武汉   430072
黄如花,女,武汉大学信息管理学院、武汉大学图书馆教授,博士生导师;冯婕,女,武汉大学信息管理学院博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2022-06-17

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-30

A Content Analysis of International Digital Literacy and Skills Frameworks

Expand

Received date: 2022-06-17

  Online published: 2022-08-30

摘要

全民数字素养与技能日益成为国际竞争力的关键指标,备受全球各界瞩目。探析国际数字素养与技能框架的内容,有助于为我国构建全民数字素养与技能框架提供依据。文章采用网络调研法和内容分析法,分析14个国际数字素养与技能框架的内容,系统梳理框架的共性要素,总结其特点和问题。研究发现,国际数字素养与技能框架的内容可归纳为信息维度、社会维度、伦理维度、迁移维度和目标维度;其特点在于融合多种素养、重视社会联结、强调风险规避、发散多元思维、趋向全面发展;存在的问题包括:内容要素分布不均、内容要素描述不充分、新兴素养设置不足、本土适用程度不高。

本文引用格式

黄如花 冯 婕 . 国际数字素养与技能框架的内容分析[J]. 图书与情报, 2022 , 42(03) : 73 -83 . DOI: 10.11968/tsyqb.1003-6938.2022040

Abstract

Globally, digital literacy and skills for all has increasingly become a key indicator of international competitiveness. Exploring the contents of international digital literacy and skills frameworks could lay a solid foundation for the development of Chinese digital literacy and skills framework for all. This paper analyzes the contents of 14 international digital literacy and skills frameworks, systematically explores the common elements, and summarizes their features and shortcomings through network investigation and content analysis methods. Five common dimensions included in these frameworks are identified, i.e., information dimension, social dimension, ethical dimension, migration dimension, and goal dimension. We conclude that there are five features for the current development of frameworks. The most distinguished feature is that these frameworks tend to integrate the contents of multiple literacies. Collaboration ability and digital security are always placed in the central position. Moreover, creativity and problem-solving are considered as high-level skills in many frameworks. Finally, the all-round development of students and trainees is a common goal. As for the major problems, the primary one is that the attention paid to diverse digital abilities are unbalanced. Second, these frameworks do not define and describe the ability requirements they proposed specific enough. Third, various digital-related capabilities are growingly essential in the digital age, while they remain excluded in current frameworks. Fourthly, these frameworks could hardly satisfy Chinese development strategies.
文章导航

/