文献证据检索的信度研究:基于循证视角*

展开
  • 1.西北师范大学商学院  
    2.兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心  
    3.兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心
卢洁妤,女,西北师范大学商学院硕士研究生;魏志鹏,男,兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心、兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心博士研究生;周文杰,男,西北师范大学商学院教授;杨克虎,男,兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心、兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心教授。

收稿日期: 2021-11-28

  网络出版日期: 2021-12-25

基金资助

*本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“循证社会科学的理论体系、国际经验与中国路径研究”(项目编号:19ZDA142)研究成果之一。

Research on Reliability of Documentary Evidence Retrieval: Based on Evidence-based Perspective

Expand

Received date: 2021-11-28

  Online published: 2021-12-25

摘要

在传统的查全率和查准率检索评价指标,以及循证研究证据的分级体系和证据转化整合理论基础上引入了信度评价指标,为循证社会科学领域原始研究文献证据质量的科学评价提供了理论依据。对前序研究得到的文献证据数据集进行信度评价发现:出现“关键词or全文”检索项在高相关数据集中重测信度更高,出现“关键词and摘要”的检索项在中相关数据集结果最稳定;复本信度检验结果显示:中相关数据集中出现“关键词or全文”和“摘要or全文”检索项的复本信度都很高,而在高相关数据集中,又出现“主题or关键词”的可靠性较强。

本文引用格式

卢洁妤 魏志鹏 周文杰 杨克虎 . 文献证据检索的信度研究:基于循证视角*[J]. 图书与情报, 2021 , 41(06) : 60 -68 . DOI: 10.11968/tsyqb.1003-6938.2021093

Abstract

This study conducted a research on the reliability of literature evidence retrieval from an evidence-based perspective, besides this study also explored the replica reliability and test-retest reliability of different retrieval methods. Based on the analysis of the relevant literature, it is found that the retrieval items with "keyword or full text" have higher test-retest reliability in the high correlation data set, and the retrieval items with "keyword and abstract" have the most stable results in the relevant data set; for the replica reliability, "keyword or full text" and "abstract or full text" in the relevant data set is very high, while the reliability of "subject or keyword" in the highly relevant data set is strong. This study shed light on the reliability evaluation index to ensure the stability and consistency of evidence retrieval, provide higher quality evidence for systematic review and meta-analysis, and provide theoretical support for evidence-based quality evaluation research.
文章导航

/