文章在传统的查全率和查准率检索评价指标、循证研究证据的分级体系和证据转化整合理论基础上提出了敏感度科学性评价指标，为循证社会科学领域原始研究文献证据质量的科学评价提供了理论依据。通过抽样匹配展开敏感度评价实证检验发现：连接符and比or更能降低检索结果的敏感性；从敏感度的角度看，为提高查准率，可以优先原则基于“篇名”项的检索式，为提高查全率，则可以选择“摘要”项的组合或单项检索作为补充。

This paper constructs a new evaluation index named after sensitivity, and makes an empirical analysis based on the relevant literature data. It is found that the connector ‘and’ can reduce the sensitivity of retrieval results more than ‘or’; In terms of sensitivity, to improve the accuracy retrieval rate, the "title" item should be retrieval priority. The combination with "summary" items or single retrieval can benefit for the improvement of search recall ratio. The findings of this research,which based on the assessment of sensitivity of the retrieval, are expected to benefit the researchers who focusing on the systematic review and meta-analysis to conduct research synthesis related research.