专题:文献证据检索的科学性评价

循证视角下文献证据检索的科学性评价:缘起、指标与趋势*

展开
  • 1.西北师范大学商学院   
    2.兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心   
    3.兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心
周文杰,男,西北师范大学商学院教授;赵悦言,女,西北师范大学商学院硕士研究生;魏志鹏,男,兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心、兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心博士研究生;杨克虎,男,兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心、兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心教授。

收稿日期: 2021-11-28

  网络出版日期: 2021-12-25

基金资助

*本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“循证社会科学的理论体系、国际经验与中国路径研究”(项目编号:19ZDA142)研究成果之一。

Scientific Evaluation of Literature Evidence Retrieval Quality from the Perspective of Evidence-based Research: Initiation, Index and Trend

Expand

Received date: 2021-11-28

  Online published: 2021-12-25

摘要

科学化、规范化的循证社会科学研究以全面、精准的文献证据检索为基本保障。对文献证据检索的科学性评价在立足于传统的查全率和查准率指标,以及引入信度、效度等测量工具质量评价指标的基础上,进一步提出了饱和度、冗余度、敏感度等指标。基于循证社会科学的未来发展,可以发现,文献证据检索的科学性评价呈现出检索过程趋于标准化、检索结果评价趋于可计量化、不依赖于文献数据全集的自动化评估方法、考虑检索成本的效益等发展趋势。

本文引用格式

周文杰 赵悦言 魏志鹏 杨克虎 . 循证视角下文献证据检索的科学性评价:缘起、指标与趋势*[J]. 图书与情报, 2021 , 41(06) : 31 -36 . DOI: 10.11968/tsyqb.1003-6938.2021089

Abstract

The retrieval quality of literature evidence is the basic guarantee of high-level evidence-based research. Based on the analysis of the initial problem of document evidence retrieval in the field of evidence-based research, this paper draws on the reasonable components of traditional recall and precision indicators and overcomes their shortcomings, puts forward new literature evidence retrieval quality assessment indicators such as saturation, redundancy and sensitivity, and introduces the indicators of the quality of measurement tools such as reliability and validity into this field. Furthermore, this paper shed light on the future trend of scientific evaluation of literature evidence retrieval quality in evidence-based social science research. The literature quality evaluation index involved in this paper lays a foundation for the follow-up empirical research.
文章导航

/