：近年来，循证决策在全球范围内掀起了一场政策“有效性”变革的浪潮，但也受到越来越多理论和实践的挑战。基于治理理论和善治理论的观点，许多学者探讨了“循证治理”相关的概念，以弥合“循证”思潮与主流公共管理理论的断桥。文章从证据生产、评价、使用和价值取向四个方面阐释了从循证决策到循证治理的转变逻辑，类比循证医学三要素提出了循证治理的三要素：证据、领导力和公共价值。文章以循证领域的主要研究方法——系统评价为分析对象，考察了循证医学和公共管理领域系统评价研究的方法论异同，呈现了Campbell数据库中一项公共管理领域系统评价研究,并讨论了方法论启示。循证治理的未来研究问题包括中层理论构建、知识转化、方法论研究、本土化研究以及大数据与计算社会科学背景下的循证治理等。

In recent years, evidence-based policy-making has raised a wave of changes on policy "effectiveness" globally. At the same time, the concepts and frameworks of evidence-based policy-making are being challenged more and more both in theory and practice. Based on the theory of governance and good governance, many scholars have explored the concepts related to "evidence-based governance" to fill the gap between the trend of "evidence-based" thought and the mainstream public management theory. This article illustrates the logic of change from evidence-based policy-making to evidence-based governance from the perspectives of production, evaluation, utilization and the value propositions of evidence, and puts forward three elements of evidence-based management, including evidence, leadership, and public value comparing with the three elements of evidence-based medicine. The article examines the methodological similarities and differences between systematic review research，the main research method in the evidence-based field,  in evidence-based medicine and in the field of public management and presents a systematic review case in public management field in Campbell database， and discusses its methodological implications. The future research questions of evidence-based governance include the construction of middle-level theory, knowledge transformation, methodology, indigenous research and the evidence-based governance under the background of big data and social computing.